Ahh yes the slippery slope of unintended consequences, or are they? Seems that while everyone has got their underwear bombs in a bunch over a majority of the citizens of North Carolina, joining with a 31 state majority, of prohibiting homosexuals from getting married, they the heterophobes are either missing the point...or have a very sinister master plan.
I do not think a majority of Americans would have issues with civil unions. A legal contract between to people granting them the EXACT same legal rights that married people enjoy. No the problem is with the word MARRIAGE. See marriage is a church function that the government leached on too. Not the other way around...the GOVERNMENT got involved it the church FIRST. Not the other way around as the heterophobes would have you believe.
The slippery slope...or sinister plan is this...what do they (the heterophobes) do when a church or synagogue refuses to allow homosexuals the right to marry because it conflicts with their moral teachings? Hmmm....
Can you say ACLU...they will use the ACLU to sue the churches into violating their core beliefs.
Why else would the heterophobes be demanding marriage and not just the acceptance of a legal contract called a civil union?
The churches should dissociate with government marriages all together. The reverends, priests, and rabbis should refuse to do any paperwork or sign any marriage licences in protest. Force EVERYONE that wants to get married to also have to go the the Justice of the Peace for it to be legal in the eyes of big brother. This is not a new idea...there are plenty of places that do just that. Germany is one. Imagine... all those people who get married in churches being forced to the local county seat and tying up the system so they can have their civil unions recognized too?
Let marriage be the religious service, and the civil union be the government document. Unless of course your real goal is to divide the country, and create havoc with the organized religion you loath.
No comments:
Post a Comment